Ads keep abortion in spotlight9:15 am | October 22, 2012
DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer
NEW YORK (AP) — Though Barack Obama and Mitt Romney rarely tackle the topic of abortion head-on, the void is being filled by rival advocacy groups targeting swing states with ads depicting one or the other candidate as an extremist in his stance on the divisive issue.
Obama, according to the National Right to Life Committee, is “the most pro-abortion president this country has ever seen.” Another anti-abortion group, the Susan B. Anthony List, is running anti-Obama TV ads titled “Abortion Radical.”
From the other side, groups supporting legal access to abortion, as well as the Obama campaign itself, depict Romney and his running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, as eager to ban most abortions as part of a Republican “war on women.” The GOP ticket “is extremely dangerous to women’s health,” says Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America.
Numerous polls indicate that abortion and other hot-button social issues aren’t top priorities for most Americans as they worry about jobs and health care. Yet abortion is a visceral subject for some voters — and the extent to which they turn out to vote, and perhaps sway wavering acquaintances, could make a difference in pivotal swing states.
There’s extra intensity this year because Obama and Romney — reflecting their party platforms — are so polarized in regard to abortion.
Obama believes decisions about abortion should be left to women and their doctors. He affirmed this outlook during his acceptance speech at the Democratic convention, where the prime-time speakers included Keenan and Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Romney opposes abortion except in cases of rape, incest and threat to the mother’s life, and says the Supreme Court should repeal the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that established a nationwide right to abortion. He also would end federal aid to Planned Parenthood, which is a major provider of abortion and contraception.
“There are such sharp differences between the two candidates, it’s not surprising the advocacy groups are so engaged,” said Mark Rozell, a political science professor at George Mason University in the swing state of Virginia. “They think other voters must feel the same way.”
Planned Parenthood, through its political action affiliates, has spent more on this election than any in the past — more than $12 million, with about half the money going for TV ads in Florida, Virginia, Ohio and other battleground states.
Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund, said a large chunk of the funds had been donated by new contributors eager to fight back against Republican efforts to restrict abortion at the state and federal level.
“People have woken up and said, ‘Not only are they serious, but they’re close to imposing their will on the women of America,’” Laguens said.
Among the biggest spenders on the anti-abortion side is the Susan B. Anthony List. Along with its political action committees, it has reported more than $3 million in expenditures, including TV ads in Ohio, Virginia, Florida and Colorado.
The group’s president, Marjorie Dannenfelser, said the ads seek to depict Obama as an extremist in regard to abortion and to woo undecided, socially conservative Democrats, including Hispanics.
“It’s hard to argue that the ‘war on women’ theme has stuck,” Dannenfelser said. “The gender gap has closed since the first debate, and the women’s vote is the most fluid I’ve seen.”
Some of the swing states experienced controversies earlier this year that put a spotlight on abortion even before the presidential race heated up.
In Virginia, there was a surge of protests earlier this year when the Republican-controlled Legislature passed a bill requiring women to undergo pre-abortion sonograms. Initially, it mandated a vaginally invasive procedure, drawing charges from female Democratic legislators that it amounted to “state mandated rape.”